MP53-12 CUTANEOUS URETEROSTOMY: WHAT ONCE WAS OLD IS NEW AGAIN

You have accessJournal of UrologyTrauma/Reconstruction/Diversion: Ureter (including Pyeloplasty) and Bladder Reconstruction fistula), Augmentation, Substitution, Diversion II (MP53)1 Sep 2021MP53-12 CUTANEOUS URETEROSTOMY: WHAT ONCE WAS OLD IS NEW AGAIN Randy Casals, Tyler Overholt, Adil Siddique, Alexander Tsivian, Matvey Tsivian CasalsRandy Casals More articles by this author , OverholtTyler Overholt SiddiqueAdil Siddique TsivianAlexander TsivianMatvey View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002083.12AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) as an option for urinary diversion after radical cystectomy has fallen out favor due a perceived higher risk stomal stenosis eventual failure. Herein we review the literature assess reported outcomes CU method diversion. METHODS: We reviewed on surgical cutaneous PubMed with hand searching references. Studies were included if they presented or techniques title, abstract, content study including case series, prospective trials, retrospective analyses. Exclusion criteria existing reviews, reports, editorials, reports in languages other than English. The primary outcome was tube-free rate. secondary rate complications. RESULTS: A total 13 studies (published between 1970-2019). most common Toyoda Ariyoshi methods, each being used 3 different studies. Within 11 that allowed analysis rate, median 73% (range 20-95%) follow-up period 27.6 months. any complications ranged from 3.8-47% range gastrointestinal 0-3.8%. CONCLUSIONS: is useful technique cystectomy. Although it less popular perception high failure supports valid choice success depending associated fewer perioperative There are several perform which offer surgeons many options diverse patient population. Considering multiple comorbidities patients undergoing cystectomy, offers considerably morbid should be considered Source Funding: None © 2021 American Urological Association Education Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e943-e943 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Expand Loading ...